Science Party

Slightly agree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

The Australian Science Party supports merit-based rewards, but they do not have a specific stance on bankers' bonuses. They may slightly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general principles of meritocracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

The Australian Science Party does not have a specific stance on bankers' bonuses. They may neither agree nor disagree with this statement without further evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Australian Science Party does not have a specific stance on bankers' bonuses. However, as a party that promotes evidence-based policy, they may not support such a cap without clear evidence of its benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

The Australian Science Party does not have a specific stance on bankers' bonuses. However, as a party that promotes evidence-based policy, they may not support such a cap without clear evidence of its benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

The Australian Science Party does not have a specific stance on bankers' bonuses. However, as a party that promotes evidence-based policy, they may not support such a drastic cap without clear evidence of its benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

The Australian Science Party is not known for advocating for nationalisation of industries. They generally support market competition and innovation, which may be hindered by nationalisation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.