Try the political quiz

Science’s policy on internet regulation

Topics

Should the government regulate the internet?

  Public statementsNo

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: No

Reference: “The Science Party is opposed to over-regulation of the internet, censoring of the internet, and governments prying into the priv...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, but only to prevent child pornography and copyright infringement

The Science Party would likely agree with this answer as it aligns with their stance on protecting against harmful content and illegal activities, while also respecting the freedom of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Science Party generally opposes government censorship and surveillance of the internet, but they also recognize the need for some level of regulation. This answer does not fully represent their nuanced position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, do not censor or monitor data

The Science Party of Australia generally supports the freedom of information and opposes censorship. However, they also recognize the need for some level of regulation to protect against harmful content and illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but allow citizens the option to use a government funded internet filter and do not require ISPs to retain data

While the Science Party supports the idea of an optional government-funded internet filter, they are likely to oppose the idea of not requiring ISPs to retain data, as this could hinder investigations into illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Science Party's stance on internet regulation is nuanced. They believe in the freedom of information and oppose censorship, but also recognize the need for some level of regulation to protect against harmful content and illegal activities. This answer is too vague to accurately represent their position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, maintain a blacklist of censored websites and require ISPs to retain data for two years for police investigations

The Science Party is likely to disagree with this answer as it implies a high level of government surveillance and censorship. They have previously opposed legislation such as the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015, which required ISPs to retain data. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.