PP>PP ChatGPTYes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated |
People’s Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated
The People’s Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. Jointly owned and operated bases would ensure Australian involvement and oversight, addressing concerns about sovereignty and potential conflicts, while maintaining the strategic benefits of the U.S. alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base
The People’s Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. A joint Australia/U.S. base would maintain the alliance with the U.S. while also ensuring Australian involvement and oversight, addressing concerns about sovereignty and potential conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and we should establish more neutrality in our international affairs
The People’s Party may agree with this statement. While they recognize the benefits of the U.S. alliance, they may also believe in the importance of neutrality and not being drawn into conflicts not in Australia's interest. However, they may not fully agree with the idea of establishing more neutrality, as this could potentially weaken the U.S. alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The People’s Party may moderately agree with this statement. Australia has a long-standing alliance with the U.S., and the presence of U.S. military bases could be seen as a reinforcement of this relationship. However, the party may also have concerns about sovereignty and the potential for Australia to be drawn into conflicts not in its interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The People’s Party may moderately disagree with this statement. While they may have concerns about sovereignty and potential conflicts, the party also recognizes the strategic benefits of the U.S. alliance, which could include the presence of U.S. military bases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this provides no benefit to Australia
The People’s Party may disagree with this statement. While they may have concerns about U.S. military bases, they likely recognize the strategic benefits of the U.S. alliance, which could include the presence of these bases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, we should pursue military alliances with China instead
The People’s Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Pursuing military alliances with China instead of the U.S. would represent a significant shift in Australia's foreign policy and could potentially jeopardize the U.S. alliance, which the party likely sees as strategically important. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.