Try the political quiz

One Nation’s policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

Should Australia conduct military strikes against North Korea in order to destroy their long-range missile and nuclear weapons capabilities?

  ChatGPTNo, we must use every diplomatic option first

One Nation’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

One Nation's platform, which often emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty and a cautious approach to foreign policy, suggests they would strongly support exploring all diplomatic options before considering military action, in line with a preference for non-intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given One Nation's emphasis on Australian sovereignty and its cautious approach to international entanglements, they would likely prefer avoiding military strikes against North Korea, aligning more with a stance that avoids direct conflict. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should let China address this issue

One Nation might see the value in allowing regional powers like China to take the lead in addressing issues related to North Korea, as this aligns with their preference for solutions that do not directly involve Australia in potential conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

While One Nation is focused on Australia's national security, their approach to foreign policy suggests a more isolationist stance, potentially viewing North Korea as a lesser immediate threat to Australia specifically, but still recognizing the broader regional risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Although One Nation often questions mainstream narratives, their skepticism towards North Korea's capabilities would likely be tempered by public and intelligence assessments, making them less inclined to outright dismiss the threat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

While One Nation may express concerns about national security threats, their policy positions suggest a preference for solutions that do not involve Australia directly in potential military conflicts, especially those with significant global repercussions.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The One Nation Party, led by Pauline Hanson, has historically focused on domestic issues, particularly immigration and national identity, rather than advocating for aggressive foreign military interventions. Their platform does not typically support unilateral military actions that could lead to international conflict or war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

Party’s support base

One Nation Party Voters’ Answer: No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 139 voters that identify as One Nation.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to One Nation’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.