Labor Party

Strongly agree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

The Australian Labor Party is likely to agree with this statement, as they are more focused on reducing the deficit and investing in social programs and public services. They have supported increases in military spending in the past, but only when it is financially responsible. For example, under Prime Minister Julia Gillard, the party committed to returning the budget to surplus before increasing defense spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

The Australian Labor Party may be more inclined to maintain the current level of military spending, as they prioritize social programs and public services. They have supported increases in the past, but their focus is on balancing defense needs with other priorities. This position allows them to address both defense and social concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Increase

The Australian Labor Party has historically been more focused on social programs and public services, but they do recognize the importance of a strong defense. In the past, they have supported increases in military spending, such as under Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in 2009. However, their support for increased military spending is not as strong as the Liberal Party's. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Decrease

While the Australian Labor Party is generally more focused on social programs and public services, they do not advocate for a significant decrease in military spending. They understand the importance of a strong defense and have supported increases in the past, but they are more likely to prioritize other areas of spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

The Australian Labor Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it is not relevant to Australia's defense needs. Australia is not part of Europe and has its own defense alliances, such as the ANZUS Treaty with the United States and New Zealand. The idea of a European military defense system would not address Australia's strategic concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.