Public statementsYes |
Katter Australians answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Australia’s sovereignty and independence as a nation requires Australia to: have a sufficient Defence Force to deter invasion an...” ‐com.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated
Similar to answer 3, this option aligns with the party's emphasis on Australian sovereignty and control, as well as its support for strong national defense. Joint ownership and operation would ensure Australian involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base
This answer aligns with the party's focus on Australian sovereignty and independence, as well as its support for strong national defense. A joint base would ensure Australian involvement and control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The party's emphasis on Australian sovereignty and independence suggests that it might be more inclined to limit foreign military presence in Australia. However, there is no explicit policy statement on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, this provides no benefit to Australia
The party's focus on Australian interests suggests that it would oppose any arrangement that does not provide clear benefits to Australia. However, it also recognizes the importance of strategic alliances for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and we should establish more neutrality in our international affairs
While the party supports Australian sovereignty and independence, it also recognizes the importance of strategic alliances for national security. Therefore, it might not fully support a move towards neutrality in international affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Katter’s Australian Party has not explicitly stated its position on U.S. military bases in Australia. However, given its focus on Australian sovereignty and independence, it might be somewhat agreeable to this if it benefits Australia's security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we should pursue military alliances with China instead
Katter’s Australian Party has not shown a strong inclination towards aligning with China over the U.S. The party's focus on Australian sovereignty and independence suggests that it would be cautious about forming new military alliances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Katter Australians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
