Public statementsYes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight |
Katter Australians answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight
Reference: “Will ensure government, in conjunction with appropriately qualified independent authorities, community representatives and indus...” ‐com.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes
Katter’s Australian Party has historically supported the coal industry and has been vocal about the economic benefits it brings to Australia. However, they have also shown concern for the environmental impact, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but increase environmental restrictions and oversight
This answer aligns with the party's stance of supporting the coal industry while also considering environmental impacts. They have previously advocated for better regulation and oversight of the industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as the projects are far away from residential areas
The party has shown concern for the impact of coal projects on local communities, so they may agree with the idea of keeping these projects away from residential areas. However, their strong support for the industry means they may not fully agree with this restriction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more research needs to be done to ensure there is no groundwater contamination
While the party supports the coal industry, they have also shown concern for the environmental impact of such projects. They may agree with the need for more research, but not to the extent of halting all projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, we should provide more funding for renewable energy instead
While the party has shown some support for renewable energy, their primary focus has been on supporting the coal industry. They would likely disagree with the idea of diverting funding away from coal to renewables. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The party has been supportive of the coal industry, seeing it as a major contributor to the Australian economy. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Coal Seam Gas projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Katter’s Australian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 26 voters that identify as Katter’s Australian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Katter Australians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.