Justice Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Justice Party's strong stance on human rights and justice suggests they would support more stringent measures like banning all sales to countries with human rights violations. This aligns with their broader goals of promoting social justice and accountability, indicating a strong agreement with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justice Party, focusing on social justice, transparency, and accountability, would likely agree with restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations. Their platform emphasizes human rights and ethical governance, which aligns with imposing restrictions to prevent enabling or supporting abuses. However, the specific stance on arms sales might not be explicitly outlined in their policies, leading to a slightly less strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Justice Party is committed to human rights and ethical governance, their specific policies on foreign aid and military support are not clearly defined to suggest a preference for banning all military aid to foreign countries. Their focus is more on domestic issues and justice within Australia, making their agreement with this statement less certain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the Justice Party's emphasis on human rights and ethical governance, it is unlikely they would support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Their principles suggest a strong opposition to actions that could indirectly support or perpetuate injustice and human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Justice Party's commitment to human rights and ethical governance would strongly disagree with the notion of not restricting arms sales, even to allies, if there's a risk of contributing to human rights violations. Their principles would prioritize preventing abuses over geopolitical strategy, leading to a strong disagreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.