Try the political quiz

Health Australia’s policy on nuclear energy

Topics

Do you support the use of nuclear energy?

HAP>HAP  ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

Health Australia’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

This answer aligns with the Health Australia party's focus on natural health and well-being, as well as their likely support for cleaner, renewable energy sources over nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Health Australia party is likely to support cleaner, renewable energy sources over nuclear energy due to potential health and environmental risks associated with nuclear power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

While the Health Australia party would likely support increased investment into cleaner, renewable alternatives, they might still have concerns about the use of nuclear energy in the interim. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

While the lack of public subsidy might be appealing, the Health Australia party would still likely have concerns about the health and environmental risks associated with nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Health Australia party focuses on promoting natural health and well-being, and they might have concerns about the potential health risks associated with nuclear energy, such as radiation exposure and nuclear waste. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but with public subsidy

The Health Australia party would likely disagree with public subsidy for nuclear energy, as they would prefer those funds to be directed towards cleaner, renewable energy sources and health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and nationalise the industry

Nationalizing the industry would not alleviate the Health Australia party's concerns about the potential health and environmental risks associated with nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Health Australia Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 67 voters that identify as Health Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Health Australia’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.