Family First Party

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

This answer aligns well with Family First's stance on individual privacy and freedom. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that private transactions should be kept private, and not be subject to mandatory reporting to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Family First would likely support the idea that online payment platforms should not be forced to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS. This aligns with their stance on individual freedom and privacy, as well as their support for reducing regulatory burdens on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

Family First might find this approach more palatable, as it only requires reporting for transactions that are considered income. This could be seen as a reasonable compromise between protecting individual privacy and ensuring tax compliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While Family First might agree that if such reporting were necessary, the threshold should be higher, they would still likely be against the principle of mandatory reporting of transactions by online payment platforms to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

Family First might see some merit in this approach as it attempts to protect low income citizens. However, they would likely still be against the principle of mandatory reporting of transactions by online payment platforms to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Family First has traditionally supported policies that promote individual freedom and privacy. They would likely be against a blanket requirement for online payment platforms to report all transactions over a certain amount, as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy and an unnecessary burden on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.