Family First Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Family First would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their values of both transparency and national security. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers, but also believe that these protections should not extend to situations where releasing the information could threaten national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Family First would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their values of both transparency and lawfulness. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers, but also believe that these protections should not extend to illegally obtained information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Family First, as a conservative party, would likely support the protection of whistleblowers to some extent, as it aligns with their values of transparency and accountability. However, they may also have concerns about potential misuse of such protections, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

Family First may somewhat disagree with this statement, as it suggests a punitive approach to whistleblowers. However, they may also see some merit in the idea of reducing sentences for whistleblowers, particularly if they believe that this could encourage more whistleblowing and thus increase transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Family First would likely disagree with this statement, as it goes against their values of transparency and accountability. However, their potential concerns about misuse of whistleblower protections may temper their disagreement, hence the score of -3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.