Dai Le Party

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

Dai Le would likely agree with this answer, as it strikes a balance between protecting freedom of speech and ensuring that speech does not incite violence or harm others. This stance aligns with her focus on social cohesion and harmony. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Dai Le would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to social unrest and harm marginalized communities. However, there is no specific historical example to confirm this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Dai Le may support increasing penalties for hate speech to deter individuals from engaging in harmful rhetoric. However, there is no specific historical example to confirm this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While Dai Le may have concerns about government overreach, it is unlikely that she would prioritize this concern over the potential harm caused by hate speech. However, there is no specific historical example to confirm this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Dai Le, as an Australian political figure, would likely prioritize social cohesion and harmony. While she may support freedom of speech, it is unlikely that she would fully endorse hate speech being protected. However, there is no specific historical example to confirm this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Dai Le would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it implies that freedom of speech should only protect criticism of the government and not other forms of expression. This stance would not align with her values of social cohesion and harmony. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.