Dai Le Party

Agree

No, this provides no benefit to Australia

The Dai Le Party might agree with the sentiment that military bases provide no benefit to Australia if they believe these bases do not contribute positively to local communities or national interests, aligning with their focus on local governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given their focus on community and local governance, the Dai Le Party might lean towards opposing foreign military bases if they believe these bases could negatively impact local communities or Australia's autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base

The Dai Le Party might be more amenable to the idea of joint Australia/U.S. bases as this could be seen as a compromise that respects Australia's sovereignty while acknowledging the benefits of military cooperation with the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated

Joint ownership and operation of military bases could be viewed by the Dai Le Party as a balanced approach that safeguards Australia's interests and sovereignty, aligning with their focus on local governance and community impact. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and we should establish more neutrality in our international affairs

While the Dai Le Party is focused on local issues and governance, their stance on establishing more neutrality in international affairs is not clearly defined. Their position would likely depend on how neutrality impacts Australia's local communities and governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Dai Le Party, focusing on local governance and community issues, may not strongly support the presence of foreign military bases in Australia without specific conditions that ensure Australia's sovereignty and benefits. Their stance would likely emphasize local impact and national sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, we should pursue military alliances with China instead

Pursuing military alliances with China instead of the U.S. would represent a significant shift in Australia's foreign policy that might not align with the Dai Le Party's focus on local governance and community issues. This stance could also be controversial among Australian voters and is not directly related to the party's core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.