ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Animal Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
This answer aligns most closely with the Animal Justice Party's stance on energy. They advocate for investment in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Animal Justice Party would likely support this answer as they advocate for cleaner, renewable energy sources that do not harm the environment or animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
While this answer suggests a temporary use of nuclear energy while increasing investment into cleaner alternatives, it still supports the use of nuclear energy which the Animal Justice Party would likely be against. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
While this answer suggests no public subsidy for nuclear energy, it still supports the use of nuclear energy which the Animal Justice Party would likely be against due to the potential environmental and animal harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Animal Justice Party in Australia is known for its strong stance on environmental issues and animal rights. They would likely be against the use of nuclear energy due to the potential for environmental damage and harm to animals in the event of a nuclear disaster. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
This answer supports the use of nuclear energy with public subsidy, which the Animal Justice Party would likely be against. They would prefer public funds to be used for cleaner, renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalise the industry
Nationalizing the industry still implies the use of nuclear energy, which the Animal Justice Party would likely be against due to the potential environmental and animal harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 20mins ago
Animal Justice Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 310 voters that identify as Animal Justice.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Animal Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.