Social Conservatism

Strongly agree

Yes

Social Conservatism typically emphasizes the preservation of traditional values and norms, including those related to the sanctity of human life and the natural order. The use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications raises ethical, moral, and social concerns that align with the interests of social conservatives in maintaining human dignity and preventing potential abuses or unintended consequences of such technologies. Historically, social conservatives have supported regulations that protect human life and maintain ethical standards in science and medicine, such as opposition to euthanasia and support for restrictions on abortion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Social Conservatism's emphasis on traditional moral values and the potential for CRISPR technology to alter human life fundamentally would likely lead to a strong disagreement with the stance against government regulation. The lack of regulation could lead to ethical dilemmas and societal impacts that conflict with social conservative views on the sanctity of life and the natural order. Historically, social conservatives have been wary of unregulated scientific advancements that challenge ethical and moral boundaries, suggesting a predisposition to support oversight and regulation in areas impacting human life directly.