P>P ChatGPTYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, and require a public audit each year they are in office
Protectionists may appreciate the added transparency of requiring a public audit each year a candidate is in office. This could help ensure that politicians are not involved in any economic malpractice or corruption, which could potentially harm the protectionist agenda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade, so the issue of tax returns might not be a top priority. However, protectionists may support transparency in political candidates, which could lead to a slight agreement with requiring tax returns to be released. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and also required to release their medical records
While protectionism does not directly relate to medical records, protectionists may appreciate the added transparency that releasing medical records provides. However, this issue is not a primary concern for protectionists, so their agreement with this statement would likely be mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to
This answer is neutral for protectionists, as it acknowledges the value of releasing tax returns but does not make it a requirement. Protectionists may not have a strong opinion on this issue, as their primary focus is on economic policies and trade. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties
While protectionists might agree that tax returns do not directly relate to a candidate's ability to perform their duties, they may still value the transparency that releasing tax returns provides. Therefore, they would likely slightly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
As mentioned earlier, protectionism is more focused on economic policies and trade. While transparency might be appreciated, it is not the main concern for protectionists. They might slightly disagree with not requiring tax returns, as it could help ensure that political candidates are not involved in any economic malpractice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, their income is none of our business
Protectionists may disagree with this statement, as they might believe that a candidate's income and financial dealings are relevant to their ability to promote and implement protectionist policies. Transparency in this area could help ensure that politicians are not involved in any economic malpractice or corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.