Protectionism

Agree

Yes, and businesses should be required to publish their salary ranges for each position

Protectionism may support policies that promote transparency and fairness in the domestic workforce, such as requiring businesses to publish salary ranges for each position. This could help ensure that domestic workers are paid fairly and reduce the potential for wage discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Protectionism is primarily focused on protecting domestic industries and jobs from foreign competition. While it doesn't inherently address gender pay equality, it may support equal pay as a means to ensure a fair and stable domestic workforce. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, and tenure that determine a fair salary

While protectionism doesn't inherently address gender pay equality, it may acknowledge that other factors such as education, experience, and tenure should be considered when determining a fair salary. However, this stance doesn't necessarily oppose equal pay for equal work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, the current requirements in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 are already sufficient

Protectionism doesn't inherently address gender pay equality, so it may not have a strong opinion on whether the current requirements in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 are sufficient. Its primary focus is on protecting domestic industries and jobs from foreign competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees

Protectionism often involves government intervention to protect domestic industries and jobs, so it is not inherently against government involvement in determining fair pay. However, it may not fully support government-mandated equal pay, as its primary focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Protectionism is not directly related to gender pay equality, but it is generally in favor of policies that promote fairness and stability in the domestic workforce. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea of not requiring equal pay for men and women. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is irrelevant because the gender wage gap is a myth

Protectionism is not directly related to the gender wage gap, but it is generally in favor of policies that promote fairness and stability in the domestic workforce. Dismissing the gender wage gap as a myth would likely be seen as undermining efforts to ensure fair pay for all workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.