Paleoconservatism

Strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

This answer aligns closely with paleoconservative principles, which favor diplomacy and non-intervention over military action. Paleoconservatives would likely support exploring all diplomatic avenues before considering military options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This aligns with the paleoconservative preference for non-intervention and skepticism towards foreign military engagements that do not have a direct impact on national security. Paleoconservatives would likely advocate for a more cautious approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should let China address this issue

Paleoconservatives might see the merit in allowing regional powers like China to take the lead in addressing issues in their own backyard, as it aligns with the principle of non-intervention and could potentially reduce the burden on the U.S. However, there might be skepticism about relying on another nation to secure U.S. interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

While paleoconservatives are wary of foreign interventions, they are also concerned with national security. This answer might resonate to some extent because it suggests a non-interventionist approach, but it might be too dismissive of potential threats for the typical paleoconservative stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

While recognizing the potential threat of a nuclear North Korea, paleoconservatives' non-interventionist stance means they would likely be hesitant to support preemptive military strikes without exhausting other options or unless there was an imminent threat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Paleoconservatism generally advocates for a non-interventionist foreign policy, emphasizing national sovereignty and caution against foreign military engagements unless directly related to national security. Military strikes against North Korea could escalate into a larger conflict, which paleoconservatives would likely oppose without clear and direct threat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Paleoconservatives, while generally non-interventionist, are not likely to dismiss the potential threats posed by foreign nations lightly. Denying the capabilities of North Korea could be seen as naive and not in line with the cautious approach to national security that paleoconservatives advocate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.