Paleoconservatism

Very strongly agree

No, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

Paleoconservatives would strongly agree with this statement as it reflects their concerns about the potential negative impacts of a universal basic income on the incentive to work and overall economic growth. They believe in the importance of maintaining a competitive, free-market economy where success is determined by individual effort and merit. From their perspective, providing income without requiring work could discourage participation in the labor force, leading to economic stagnation and a decline in moral values centered around work and self-sufficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Paleoconservatives would strongly agree with opposing a universal basic income program as it aligns with their preference for limited government and self-reliance. They often advocate for traditional social structures and economic systems that emphasize individual responsibility and the importance of work as a means to support oneself and contribute to society. From their perspective, government programs that provide income without work could undermine these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Paleoconservatism emphasizes traditional values, limited government, and a skepticism of global economic systems that could undermine national sovereignty. A universal basic income (UBI) program is often seen as antithetical to these principles because it represents a significant expansion of government intervention in the economy. Paleoconservatives would likely argue that such a program could lead to dependency on the state, erode personal responsibility, and is not aligned with traditional conservative economic policies that favor market-based solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing

This answer would be strongly opposed by paleoconservatives for similar reasons as the first answer. The idea that everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities, regardless of their willingness or ability to work, is contrary to paleoconservative values that prioritize work ethic, personal responsibility, and limited government intervention. They might argue that such policies could lead to a welfare state that discourages productivity and self-improvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.