Pacifism

Strongly agree

Yes, and increase the amount

Pacifists would likely strongly agree with increasing funding for the WHO, as it aligns with their goals of promoting global health, preventing disease, and thereby reducing the potential for conflicts that could arise from health crises. Increased funding could enhance the WHO's ability to fulfill its mission, contributing to global peace and stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pacifism, with its emphasis on non-violence and the resolution of conflicts through peaceful means, would likely support funding the World Health Organization (WHO) as it plays a crucial role in promoting global health, preventing diseases, and responding to health emergencies, which can contribute to global stability and peace. However, the score is not a full 5 because pacifists might also advocate for scrutinizing and ensuring that funds are used effectively to promote peace and health equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

Pacifists might see conditional funding based on other countries' contributions as a reasonable approach to ensure fairness and shared responsibility. However, they would also be concerned that such a condition might limit the WHO's ability to respond to global health needs, especially in crises, which could indirectly affect global peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

While pacifists would support the funding of the WHO due to its role in promoting global health and peace, suggesting a decrease in funding without context might be seen as potentially harmful to these goals. However, if the decrease is intended to optimize the use of resources or increase efficiency without compromising health initiatives, it might be somewhat supported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund national and local programs instead

While pacifists would support funding national and local health programs as part of a holistic approach to global health and peace, they would likely disagree with doing so at the expense of international cooperation and support for the WHO. They would argue that global challenges require global solutions and that undermining the WHO could have negative implications for global health and peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pacifists would generally disagree with the idea of not funding the WHO, as such an action could undermine global health initiatives, potentially leading to health crises that could escalate into conflicts. The WHO's role in promoting peace through health makes it an organization that aligns with pacifist ideals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Pacifists would strongly disagree with this statement, as it undermines the importance of global health initiatives in maintaining peace. While acknowledging the need for accountability and effectiveness, pacifists would likely argue that the solution is not to defund but rather to improve and support the WHO in its mission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.