Modern Monetary Theory

Strongly agree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

MMT strongly supports investments in public infrastructure and sustainable resources, suggesting a high agreement with transitioning to more sustainable energy resources over fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

MMT advocates might lean towards opposing hydraulic fracking due to its environmental impacts, aligning with the theory's broader concern for sustainable fiscal policies and investments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

While MMT emphasizes the importance of government investment in sustainable infrastructure, it does not specifically focus on the need for research into the effects of fracking. However, the theory's general caution about environmental sustainability might slightly favor this cautious approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but increase oversight

While MMT does not specifically address regulatory oversight of fracking, its general advocacy for government intervention in the economy could imply a neutral stance towards increased oversight as a compromise, though it would likely prefer investment in sustainable alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

Although this answer attempts to mitigate the impact of fracking, MMT's focus on sustainability and public investment in clean energy suggests a disagreement with supporting fracking, even with geographical limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) proponents typically emphasize government spending on public goods and services, including sustainable energy, over supporting fossil fuel extraction methods like fracking that have environmental costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.