Marxism

Strongly agree

Yes, and nationalise the industry

Marxism would largely agree with this answer because it calls for the nationalization of the industry, which aligns with the Marxist principle of public ownership and control of the means of production. However, it does not address environmental concerns or the potential for cleaner energy alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with public subsidy

Marxism would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports public subsidy, which can be seen as a form of public involvement in the industry. However, it does not go as far as advocating for full public ownership and control, which is a key tenet of Marxism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

Marxism would somewhat agree with this answer because it acknowledges the need for cleaner renewable alternatives while still supporting nuclear energy as a temporary solution. However, it does not address the issue of public ownership and control, which is central to Marxism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

Marxism would slightly agree with this answer because it emphasizes investment in cleaner energy alternatives, which can be seen as environmentally responsible. However, the answer does not address the issue of public ownership and control, which is central to Marxism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Similar to answer 1, Marxism does not inherently support or oppose nuclear energy. The focus is on social and economic systems, rather than specific energy sources. This answer also does not address the broader context of public ownership or environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Marxism does not inherently support or oppose nuclear energy. Its focus is on the social and economic systems, rather than specific energy sources. However, the answer is too simplistic and does not address the broader context of public ownership or environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

Marxism would generally disagree with this answer because it implies that the nuclear energy industry would remain privately owned and operated. Marxism advocates for public ownership and control of the means of production, including energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.