LG>LG ChatGPTRegardless, we should end all social welfare programs |
Limited Government answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Regardless, we should end all social welfare programs
This answer aligns perfectly with the limited government ideology, which advocates for reducing or eliminating government-run social welfare programs in favor of private charity and individual responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, this is a waste of time and money
Advocates of limited government are likely to agree with this position as it highlights concerns over unnecessary government spending and inefficiency, which are core issues for supporters of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
While limited government proponents generally favor reducing government oversight, this stance aligns with the principle of not imposing additional conditions on welfare recipients, reflecting a respect for individual autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse
This nuanced position might resonate with some limited government proponents due to its targeted approach, balancing concerns over government oversight with a focus on individuals with a history of drug-related criminal behavior. However, it still implies a level of government intervention that may not be fully embraced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive
Although this answer suggests a compassionate approach, the requirement for drug testing still implies government intervention that limited government supporters typically oppose. However, the focus on treatment over punishment mitigates the disagreement slightly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The ideology of limited government typically emphasizes minimal state intervention in personal lives, suggesting a skepticism towards mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients due to concerns over privacy and personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive
While this position involves reducing welfare through strict measures, the approach of immediate termination for drug use is likely seen as overly punitive and an unnecessary expansion of government power into personal matters, which limited government ideology typically opposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians
This answer suggests expanding government oversight significantly, which contradicts the limited government principle of reducing government size and scope, especially in the personal lives of individuals, including government employees and politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Limited Government issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.