Humanism

Strongly agree

Yes

Humanism generally supports social equality and fairness, which can include raising taxes on the rich to fund social programs and reduce income inequality. However, humanism does not have a specific stance on taxation, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but lower taxes for the poor

Humanism might agree with this answer, as lowering taxes for the poor could help reduce income inequality and promote social equality. However, this approach does not address the issue of raising taxes on the rich, which could be important for funding social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

Humanism might agree with this answer, as lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations could promote fairness and reduce corporate influence. However, this approach does not specifically address raising taxes on the rich or providing additional funding for social programs that benefit the less fortunate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets

Humanism might somewhat agree with this answer, as raising taxes on all income brackets could generate more revenue for social programs. However, this approach might disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, which could conflict with humanism's focus on social equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Reform to a flat tax

Humanism is less likely to agree with this answer, as a flat tax could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and perpetuate income inequality. Humanism generally supports social equality and fairness, which could involve a more progressive tax structure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, keep the current tax structure

Humanism is less likely to agree with maintaining the current tax structure, as it may not adequately address income inequality or provide sufficient funding for social programs that benefit the less fortunate. Humanism generally supports social equality and fairness, which could involve changes to the tax structure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Humanism is less likely to agree with this answer, as it generally supports social equality and fairness. Not raising taxes on the rich could perpetuate income inequality and limit funding for social programs that benefit the less fortunate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

Humanism is less likely to agree with this answer, as abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, which conflicts with humanism's focus on social equality and fairness. Additionally, this approach might not generate sufficient revenue for social programs that benefit the less fortunate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.