Federalism

Agree

Yes, as long as a disclosure is prominently displayed on packaging and restaurant menus

This answer aligns well with federalist principles, which favor allowing states or local governments to make their own decisions while also ensuring that consumers are well-informed. The requirement for disclosure ensures that the federal government is taking steps to protect consumers across all states, which is a legitimate use of federal power, while still allowing for the commercialization and innovation in food technology to proceed. This approach respects state autonomy and consumer rights, key components of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Federalism, as an ideology, emphasizes the distribution of power between the national government and the states, allowing for diverse policies to reflect the preferences of local populations. While federalism itself does not inherently dictate a position on the commercialization of lab-grown meat, it would likely support the idea that states should have the autonomy to decide on this matter individually. This score reflects a moderate agreement, acknowledging that federalism would support the commercialization if it aligns with the preferences of the states or local governments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety

Federalism does not inherently provide a clear stance on the need for more long-term studies to ensure safety before allowing the commercialization of lab-grown meat. The emphasis on safety studies could be seen as a prudent approach to new technologies, which federalism does not oppose. However, the decision to delay commercialization based on the need for more studies could be made at either the federal or state level, depending on the specific powers granted to each by the constitution or relevant legislation. This neutrality reflects the balance federalism seeks between innovation and safety, without a clear preference for immediate commercialization or delay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Under federalism, the outright prohibition of lab-grown meat at the national level might be seen as an overreach of federal authority, especially if there is interest or demand for such products in certain states. Federalism advocates for the principle that states should have the power to make their own decisions on many issues, including potentially the commercialization of lab-grown meat. Therefore, a blanket ban would likely be contrary to federalist principles, unless there was a compelling national interest or public health concern that justified such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.