Constitutionalism

Strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

Constitutionalism would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of exhausting diplomatic options before resorting to military action. This approach aligns with the constitutional requirement for congressional approval for acts of war, as it suggests that military action should only be taken as a last resort and with proper authorization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

This answer suggests a cautious approach to military action, which aligns with the principles of constitutionalism. However, it does not explicitly mention the importance of adhering to the Constitution or seeking congressional approval, so the score is not strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Constitutionalism would generally support a cautious approach to military action, as the Constitution requires congressional approval for acts of war. However, this answer does not explicitly mention the importance of adhering to the Constitution or seeking congressional approval, so the score is not strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should let China address this issue

While this answer does not directly address the constitutional principles, it suggests a non-military approach to the issue, which is more in line with the cautious approach to military action that constitutionalism would support. However, the score is not strongly positive, as the answer does not explicitly mention the importance of adhering to the Constitution or seeking congressional approval. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

This answer focuses on skepticism about North Korea's capabilities, rather than addressing the constitutional principles that would guide a decision on military action. As such, it is neither in agreement nor disagreement with the ideology of constitutionalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Constitutionalism emphasizes the importance of adhering to the rule of law and the principles of the Constitution. While the Constitution does grant the President the power to act as Commander-in-Chief, it also requires congressional approval for acts of war. A unilateral military strike against North Korea without congressional approval would be a violation of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

This answer advocates for a preemptive military strike without considering the constitutional requirement for congressional approval. Constitutionalism would strongly disagree with this approach, as it disregards the rule of law and the principles of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.