Anti-Globalization

Strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This option would strongly resonate with the anti-globalization ideology, which values privacy, autonomy, and resistance to surveillance by state or corporate entities. The ability to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would be seen as a critical tool for safeguarding personal freedom and financial sovereignty. It aligns with the movement's broader skepticism towards global financial systems and its advocacy for alternatives that empower individuals and communities outside of traditional banking frameworks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Anti-globalization advocates often emphasize the importance of sovereignty, individual rights, and resistance to overarching control by global financial institutions. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the ideology's preference for decentralization and empowerment of individuals over their financial assets. However, the aspect of government monitoring might be seen as a compromise, as it still allows for some level of oversight that could be perceived as a potential infringement on personal freedom and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

This stance would likely be opposed by anti-globalization proponents as it suggests a restriction on personal freedom and financial autonomy. The ideology typically supports the decentralization of power and is wary of government overreach, advocating for the protection of individual rights against the encroachment of both national and supranational entities. Banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets would be viewed as a move towards centralization and control, contrary to the movement's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This proposal would be vehemently opposed by anti-globalization activists as it embodies the antithesis of their core beliefs. Mandating backdoor access for government agencies into digital wallets represents a significant breach of privacy and individual rights, centralizing control and surveillance capabilities in the hands of the state. Such a policy would be perceived as a direct attack on the principles of freedom, autonomy, and resistance to global and governmental overreach that are central to the anti-globalization movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.