@ISIDEWITHQuestionsTechnologicalStarted 10mos agoActive 3wks ago

Should the government mandate that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators?

Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.9k Australia voters.

64%
Yes
36%
No
64%
Yes
36%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2SXP9Sanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only if they are under investigation or there has been accusations of poor play on the company's part.

 @9ZR2LN5answered…4mos4MO

Yes and tech companies should be reorganised into a single state corporation controlled by the Crown

 @B2ZNBGCanswered…3wks3W

To a certain extent, the companies that do not have a lot to hide shouldn't be pressured, but the tech companies with obvious actions of secrecy and a large population should share their information and algorithms as long as is doesn't breach the violations of human rights and the companies own right to keep their information safe and valuablee

 @9RSXS5Hanswered…7mos7MO

Open sourcing needs to be implemented in policy. E.g. new tech comes out / 10-20 years mandatory open sourcing

 @9RKZCVBanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, but the government should not be there to control the algorithms, just to enforce existing laws.

 @9QS3S9Lanswered…8mos8MO

No, instead provide incentives for large tech companies to share their algorithms with regulators.

 @9N7S6LFanswered…9mos9MO

no, but they shouldnt be able to steal algorithms and tech from smaller companies either.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.

 @Vot3rVo1ceChloefrom Ohio  submitted…3mos3MO

Trump meeting TikTok CEO as ban deadline looms

US President-elect Donald Trump is meeting the CEO of TikTok as the social media giant fights plans to have it banned in the US.Trump was due to meet Shou Zi Chew at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Monday, the BBC's US partner CBS News reports, citing sources familiar with the meeting.A law passed earlier this year means TikTok will be banned unless it is sold by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, before 19 January.The company has made an emergency application to the US Supreme Court to have the ban delayed.The US wants TikTok sold or banned because of alleged links between ByteDance and the Chinese state, links that both TikTok and ByteDance have always denied.The bill introducing the law said it was intended to "protect the national security of the United States from the threat posed by foreign adversary controlled applications".Trump opposes the ban - despite supporting one during his first term - partly on the grounds that it could help Facebook, which he has accused of aiding his 2020 election loss.Trump's second term, however, won't begin until he is inaugurated on 20 January, the day after the deadline set out in the law.In its filing to the Supreme Court, submitted on Monday, TikTok asked for a "modest delay" to the enforcement of the ban to "create breathing room" for a review by the Court and to allow the incoming administration to "evaluate this matter".It described TikTok as "one of the most significant speech platforms" in the US and said the ban would do "immediate irreparable harm" to the company and its users.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.