@ISIDEWITHQuestionsTechnologicalStarted 7mos agoActive 4wks ago

Should the government mandate that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators?

Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 383 New South Wales voters.

61%
Yes
39%
No
61%
Yes
39%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 383 New South Wales voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 383 New South Wales voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from New South Wales voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZR2LN5answered…4wks4W

Yes and tech companies should be reorganised into a single state corporation controlled by the Crown

 @9RSXS5Hanswered…5mos5MO

Open sourcing needs to be implemented in policy. E.g. new tech comes out / 10-20 years mandatory open sourcing

 @9RKZCVBanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but the government should not be there to control the algorithms, just to enforce existing laws.

 @9QS3S9Lanswered…6mos6MO

No, instead provide incentives for large tech companies to share their algorithms with regulators.

 @9N7S6LFanswered…7mos7MO

no, but they shouldnt be able to steal algorithms and tech from smaller companies either.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.

 @Vot3rVo1ceChloefrom Ohio  submitted…5 days5D

Trump meeting TikTok CEO as ban deadline looms

US President-elect Donald Trump is meeting the CEO of TikTok as the social media giant fights plans to have it banned in the US.Trump was due to meet Shou Zi Chew at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Monday, the BBC's US partner CBS News reports, citing sources familiar with the meeting.A law passed earlier this year means TikTok will be banned unless it is sold by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, before 19 January.The company has made an emergency application to the US Supreme Court to have the ban delayed.The US wants TikTok sold or banned because of alleged links between ByteDance and the Chinese state, links that both TikTok and ByteDance have always denied.The bill introducing the law said it was intended to "protect the national security of the United States from the threat posed by foreign adversary controlled applications".Trump opposes the ban - despite supporting one during his first term - partly on the grounds that it could help Facebook, which he has accused of aiding his 2020 election loss.Trump's second term, however, won't begin until he is inaugurated on 20 January, the day after the deadline set out in the law.In its filing to the Supreme Court, submitted on Monday, TikTok asked for a "modest delay" to the enforcement of the ban to "create breathing room" for a review by the Court and to allow the incoming administration to "evaluate this matter".It described TikTok as "one of the most significant speech platforms" in the US and said the ban would do "immediate irreparable harm" to the company and its users.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.