+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 35.2k Australia voters.

42%
Yes
58%
No
42%
Yes
58%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 35.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 35.2k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9S7LL4Xanswered…8mos8MO

I don't believe raising interest rates will be enough to prevent a housing bubble. It is more likely to make housing unaffordable to the young and low income citizens

 @B3HTBZFanswered…1mo1MO

Since 1991 , it should have been 10% never changed, first home buyers 3% , owner over 2 houses 33% , and rates set at $25000 if more than 2 houses 🏘️ money too go back to pool for homeless, first home 🏡 owners must pay 50 % tax if sold in the first 15 years

 @9QS3S9Lanswered…9mos9MO

Yes, but at a reasonable rate, and reverted back to the original rate once there is no clear threat of a housing bubble.

 @9M89ZGKanswered…11mos11MO

The government should use one of the many other tools to prevent a housing bubble instead of relying on the same one over and over to minimal effect

  @JoshLP1997answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only after a temporary rental cap, so renters aren't the ones forced to pay for the increase.

 @9G3HCKJanswered…1yr1Y

We should strive towards easier access to finance for loans, and create legislation to prevent housing pricing from reaching exorbitant levels

 @B2WGS2Xanswered…2mos2MO

No, the government should implement regulations that prevent real estate investors and landlords from locking ordinary Australians out of the housing market. Fix the capital gains tax