Public statementsYes |
Liberals answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Federal Shadow Minister for Trade, Transport and Local Government, Warren Truss, announced today that an elected Coalition Gover...” ‐org.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Agree
No
Given their conservative approach to government spending and emphasis on private sector solutions, the Liberal Party might lean towards not investing in high-speed rail, especially if it is seen as not cost-effective or if it competes with private transportation companies. Their policies have often favored road and air travel infrastructure over large-scale new public transport projects.
Slightly agree
No, but possibly later when it's affordable
This answer aligns somewhat with the Liberal Party's cautious approach to fiscal policy and infrastructure investment. They might be open to the idea of high-speed rail in the future if it becomes more affordable and if the economic case becomes clearer, reflecting their preference for financially responsible government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only if it's a cross country system linking all states
A cross-country system linking all states might appeal to the Liberal Party's interest in nation-building projects, but their support would heavily depend on the project's perceived economic viability and fiscal responsibility. They might be neutral on this proposal, weighing the potential benefits against the significant costs and risks involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes
The Liberal Party of Australia, traditionally focusing on fiscal conservatism and private sector-led development, might be cautious about large-scale government investments in infrastructure like high-speed rail without clear evidence of economic benefits. Historically, they have prioritized road infrastructure and have been less enthusiastic about massive public transport projects, which they might view as financially risky or unnecessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, if it is a Hyperloop
While the Liberal Party supports innovation and technology in the economy, the proposal for a Hyperloop system might be seen as too speculative and unproven for their taste, especially given the high costs and technological uncertainties involved. They might prefer more traditional and tested solutions for transportation needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only linking major western cities
Focusing on linking major western cities only might not align well with the Liberal Party's broader national policy goals and could be seen as too limited in scope. While they might support infrastructure projects that boost economic growth, they would likely prefer projects with a wider or more strategic national benefit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
Liberal Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only if it's a cross country system linking all states
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 383 voters that identify as Liberal.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberals policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.