Great Australian Party

Strongly agree

No, our government needs experienced leaders

The Great Australian Party, with its focus on sovereignty and the wisdom of the Australian people, might strongly agree that experience is invaluable in government, thus opposing age-based restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, this discriminates against older politicians

This aligns with the party's likely stance on protecting individual rights and opposing discrimination, including age discrimination, which mandatory testing for older politicians could be seen as. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

The party might agree with this statement, viewing mental competency as potentially subjective and the testing process as open to abuse, which could be seen as conflicting with their principles of freedom and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the party's emphasis on individual freedoms and rights, they might oppose the idea of mandatory tests as it could be seen as infringing on the rights of older politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, I would prefer term limits instead

While the party does not have a specific policy on term limits, they might see it as a more acceptable alternative to age-based competency tests, aligning somewhat with their views on government reform and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

While the party might appreciate the fairness aspect of applying the same standards to politicians of all ages, they could still view the concept of mandatory mental competency tests as problematic or an overreach of government authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Great Australian Party, with its focus on constitutional rights and freedoms, might view mandatory mental competency tests for politicians over 75 as an unnecessary imposition or as age discrimination, despite not having a specific policy on this matter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

Banning politicians over the age of retirement from running for office would likely be seen as overly restrictive and discriminatory by the party, which values individual freedoms and the contributions of experienced leaders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.