+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 17k Australia voters.

58%
Yes
42%
No
58%
Yes
42%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 17k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 17k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9WD555Wfrom Guam  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, as long as it is used only for identifying, protecting and preventing fraud.

 @B3RVGZHanswered…2 days2D

Yes, but only for government/additional identification purposes, not compulsory or necessary for all circumstances

 @B3QH7ZXfrom Uttaradit  answered…4 days4D

Yes, but not for fraud - it's helpful to improve the efficiency of government systems and consolidates the security of the personal information of citizens in a trusted place (rather than the current situation where every digital service takes your data without security oversight with impunity)

 @B3QD2B8answered…4 days4D

Yes, only if the process of safeguarding information is transparent and there is no coercion to join.

 @B3PCCBRanswered…5 days5D

tfn and id cards should already be doing this, maybe add something for people who don't have a tfn and/or id card or license.

 @B2YMYNFanswered…4wks4W

While it sounds like a good idea on the face of it there isn't an implementation known to humanity that doesn't result in data egress and non effective systems. Systems like this, for this purpose, end up costing a fortune and merely marginalizing vulnerable people further. You can only shore up your palisades at the pointy ends, not individualize the problem.

 @9V9PLZTanswered…5mos5MO

Australia is already a relatively safe place, and while security should still be instilled, it must not breach the privacy of current citizens.

 @9TQPHWXanswered…6mos6MO

The repairs should implement is national system fraud identity as said government feedback admins