ChatGPTNo |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, their focus on rural and regional issues, and lack of emphasis on immigration, suggests they may lean towards not accepting boat immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and temporary protection visas
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, their focus on rural and regional issues, and lack of emphasis on immigration, suggests they may lean towards offshore processing with hard security checks and temporary protection visas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, turn the boats back at sea and process them offshore with hard security checks and no temporary protection visas
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, their focus on rural and regional issues, and lack of emphasis on immigration, suggests they may lean towards offshore processing with hard security checks and no temporary protection visas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their stance on asylum-seeking boat immigrants. However, their focus on rural issues and lack of emphasis on immigration suggests they may not be strongly in favor of accepting boat immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, they should be treated the same as those arriving by air
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. However, their focus on rural and regional issues, and lack of emphasis on immigration, suggests they may not strongly support treating boat immigrants the same as those arriving by air. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, do not turn back boats and process them onshore
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. However, their focus on rural and regional issues, and lack of emphasis on immigration, suggests they would not strongly support the onshore processing of boat immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 378 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
