ChatGPTYes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive
While the party has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, their focus on community support and individual responsibility may suggest a moderate agreement with the idea of providing treatment for those testing positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated a position on drug testing for welfare recipients, their general conservative stance and focus on law and order may suggest a moderate agreement with this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, but their focus on transparency and accountability in government may suggest a moderate agreement with the idea of testing anyone receiving money from the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse
While the party has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, their focus on law and order may suggest a slight agreement with the idea of drug testing welfare recipients with a criminal history related to drug abuse.
Slightly agree
Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive
While the party has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, their conservative stance and focus on individual responsibility may suggest a slight agreement with the idea of terminating benefits for those testing positive for drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this is a waste of time and money
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not made clear statements about the cost-effectiveness of drug testing welfare recipients, but their conservative stance may suggest a slight disagreement with the idea that it's a waste of time and money. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given their conservative leanings, it's likely that the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would disagree with the idea of not testing welfare recipients for drugs, although they have not explicitly stated this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Regardless, we should end all social welfare programs
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not advocated for ending all social welfare programs, which would be contrary to their focus on supporting rural and regional communities, many of which rely on such programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 358 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.