I believe it is human instinct and essence to have conflict, although the nature of war will change greatly

▲▲Reply to this Agree 1 Disagree React •••Tell me more Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow 1

Reply

as society has progressed, we have seen that war tends to bring no benefits for the masses. namely, it is only the rich and wealthyy that hold control over the common class that benefits from war.
hopefully in the future as technology progresses and cooperation between nations is more and more needed, war becomes obsolete as it would only hinder the progression of our society.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link Context •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow 1

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

@9K6C4T2

Last active1yr agoActivity5 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias28%Audience bias0%Active inNo data yetPartyLaborLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

Active 2wks ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…10mos10MO

Should the government provide subsidies for first-time homebuyers?

These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to…

▲ 1.5k12 replies

@ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Australian PM Faces Backlash Over Tourette's Remark, Issues Apology

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued multiple apologies after making a controversial remark during Question Time, where he referenced Tourette's syndrome to mock a member of the opposition. The comment has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with disability advocates…

▲ 98 replies

@ISIDEWITH asked…1yr1Y

How do you define 'family' and has that definition evolved over time for you?

▲ 7034 replies

Active 4wks ago

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

No, and ban all gender transitioning treatments

▲ 2415 replies3 agree10 disagree

Active 1wk ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone…

▲ 2.9k54 replies

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

Australia Speaking English (AU)

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.