Would you be at ease with the notion that the natural beauty you enjoy may not be around for your children to see?

no. i believe our children should be able to experience everything that we are priveliged to experience and even more

I would not be at ease with this notion. I believe we need to do more for our environment to ensure our children do get to enjoy earths natural beauty.

I feel uncomfortable when I think about the fact that the next generations may miss out on the natural beauty of the world.

I am not eased by this. I want my children to be able to see the beautiful landscape that I grew up in. jk frick that

I would not be at ease, as I believe everyone should experience the world the same or better.

no i wouldn't, i would prefer for my children to be able to witness nature in its full beauty.

I am extremely uncomfortable with that notion - we should be preserving the environment and protecting natural beauty for future generations.

I would not be at ease with this notion. I believe we need to do more for our environment to ensure our children do get to enjoy earths natural beauty.

No, of course I want my kids to see natural beauty

I do not plan on having kids if the world stays this way. The world can burn for all I care.

Obviously not. If natural beauty could only be seen in documented form and instead of experienced in person, it would be horrible.

I am not at ease with this, this terrifies me, makes me not want to have children, and hate the direction that the world is going in.

No, nature is what grounds us and connects us to our planet, I can't imagine a world with no natural beauty, everyone should be able to be blessed with the sight and feeling

No, I would love for my children to experience the beautiful world that God has created for us.

No. It is sad to think about losing the Earth's natural beauty is only a few centuries. Photographs do not do it justuce.

It would be utterly crushing, I would not be at ease.

South West bud murdi unk sis cuz bud boi unk der lah cuh bud innit wogwon bud murdi unk South west does it best sista unk cousin uncle sister nanny bud.

I’m not at ease. I’d want my kids to experience the beauty of nature as I did when I was a kid.

No, I would like to have my children be able to see and feel this wonderful environment we have.

I don’t care because when I am dead I don’t know what happens.

No, I wouldn't be at ease with the notion that the natural beauty of Australia that I enjoy may not be around for my children to see.

I would not be at ease because the term of environmental degradation is something that is not only affecting Australia, but the entire world.

Anti environmentalism is stupid and self destructive

i wouldn't be at ease, because that means the world would have drastically changed for them to not see the world im living in currently

No, it is quite disturbing that so little is being done about the deteriorating state of the world.

I wouldn't be at ease, nor would I mind it at all, as I have come to terms that our world is rapidly changing into become more digital and electric. But it's still sad that they probably won't be able to see it as we do now.

no it’s sad knowing children may not see the natural environment

No - I believe it is selfish to only conserve the environment for the people who are able to experience it currently without any consideration for future lives.

No, I want my children to experience the beautiful world that I am able to live in

I wouldn't be at ease however I am not convinced that my children won't see the natural beauty that I enjoy.

I wouldn't be at ease with it considering the fact that a lot of the decay of this natural beauty is human-induced, and therefore preventable. The next generation should be able to experience the natural world as it is meant to be.

No, and I think the sad thing is that it probably won't be.

No, I want my kids to be romantics and traverse the mountains looking for the godly abominations that they have created. They also should be able to appreciate the natural beauty that this world provides and seek shelter from factories.

No, this is one of the great catastrophes of our generation.

I am not at all at ease with this notion. My children should see the same, if not better, natural beauty that I have had the privilege of enjoying in my life.

No. It is terrifying to think that the world as we currently know it will be destroyed because of rich and corporate greed

I wouldn't be at ease becuase it is already dissperaing and then their wont be much left to protect us from UV protection and other sources of health and natural remedies

It’s not anti environmentalism to understand that climate change and global warming is a fast to manipulate and control society.

it sucks, nature is really good, but if everything goes to crap and there is no nature, then bad.

no, more nature is needed to keep our planet healthy

No because it is a very sad thing that my children will live in a very capitalistic society.

Not at all. We have an obligation to protect the natural environment so that all future generations can enjoy it. We need to generate a greater understanding at all levels of society as to how our actions impact the environment, We must then learn how we cam minimise any impact and encourage governments to act accordingly. Why is it so hard for some people (including politicians) to accept that humans are having an enormous impact on climate and our environment?

Definitely not, while I do not intend to have kids, I believe that the future generation deserve to have a fresh start to their future and should see all the natural beauty the world has to offer.

I would prefer that they make sure they keep the environment fine and clean whilst making sure their plans aren’t ruined if possible.

No, it is crucial we preserve the environment for future generations.

No, its rather disturbing that the environment may not be okay by the time I grow up

No, this natural beauty also helps our environment and keep our planet alive and healthy. This is why I would most definitely not be at ease with this outcome.

No. Natural beauty is one of the few certainties in life and I'd like to preserve that as much as possible.

No. For me, witnessing natural beauty and the complex ways the environment works has been one of the main reasons life is worth living. Despite how far we have come with urban life, humanity will always have a connection to the natural world, and it would be so unimaginably depressing for future generations to lose that connection.

No, I believe even though it seems like an impossible task we should be aiming to protect the Earth as much as we can for future generations. They deserve to live in a world still filled with natural beauty but it will take alot of selflessness and teamwork to ensure this happens.

No I would not be at ease whatsoever. Ecosystems, the environment, and life on earth operate on unbelievably delicate systems that must be protected.

I would definitely not be ok with that, I want my children to be surrounded by nature.

The notion that the world around us is finite is something I have come to terms with. The issue is less with its existence, and more the lack of effort to slow the process of its deterioration. I am not at ease with the notion of the world around us disappearing, but I further disagree with the effort put in to preserve it.

No, as a generation we need to ensure there is immense amounts of natural beauty still available.

No I would not be at ease - I would like for my children to experience the natural beauty of the Earth.

I am not at ease with this. The next generation deserve to enjoy nature

no i want my kids to be able to see the world i see today

It is heartbreaking. Even now with the decrease in its natural beauty and increase in pollution, in a few years it could be gone.

Of course. A lack of biodiversity will lead to untold environmental damage that could see the earth ability to sustain life rendered obsolete

I would not be at ease. The beauty of the environment is something humanity has long connected with. Not only that, not protecting the environment will lead to global temperature changes, environmental destruction which leads to animal deaths and lower food and fuel supply, and many other problems.

No i wouldn't I would want the many generations to come to enjoy natures beauty but we also need to get with the times and realise that cities are just going to get bigger and bigger therefore more deforestation and the destruation of more habitats.

I want the planet to be healthy for me and my future generations

Definitely not, we are only realising the impact we are having on natural ecosystems and should be seeking to preserve them.

No, I would not be happy if the natural beauty is not sustained for future generations.

No I would not. I don't want to live in a concrete world.

No cause they won’t get to experience what I did as a kid

I grew up in nature and I want the children of the future to be able to see that beauty. Not the colossal metal buildings that blockout the sun. But the gorgeous trees, bushland, rainforests, beaches, all of it. They deserve that opportunity because it's what's natural for us and the world itself.

Yes. However, measures should be in place to reduce that as much as possible

that great national parks and forest and dense mountain ranges will be destroyed to make more room for cities

No I would not be at ease, the natural beauty of the world that all generations should experience as it allows us to distress from our Hectic lives

No, I would be very disappointed that my children can't see the world I grow up in and see how lovely earth is.

That is one of my biggest fears, not having any natural beauty.

No, maintaining the earth should be the top priority for governments

I would not be at ease with the notion but at the same time it is definitely not up to the individuals of a society to make amends for decades of environmental harm and neglect spearheaded by governments and large conglomerates

No. I hope the natural beauty is maintained for all generations.

No we do need some CO2 for human life and nature to flourish, it’s more about limited the plastic and material waste and using recycled materials.

No, it is extremely saddening and should not be that way.

Humans cannot alter the environment only God can do it

No I wouldn’t, I want my children to able to see the natural beauty if the world and also receive the benefits from having more greenery.

No. We should preserve the Earth as best as possible as there is only one Earth and we must allow our children to see the beauty we see today.

no, i would like people to enjoy the natural beauty and embrace it before its all gone.

Yes, but only the 'everyday' natural beauty that isn't environmentally or recreationally significant - i.e. if suitably assessed land is being cleared for development. Also, development must integrate the existing natural environment or create a suitable new one.

I think it is important to be in a enviromental place, where there is nature around. Especially for children.

No, I would not be at ease. This earth has been around for thousands of years and because of corporate greed and how we have treated it is unfair to take that privilege away from other countries.

I think as a nation, together we should clean up the streets and make nature still be around for generations onwards.