Should welfare recipients be tested for drugs?

No, this is a waste of time and money

▲ 165 Reply to this Agree 2 Disagree 1 React •••+ My feed Report Follow

Reply

@9MQC3KCfrom Guam agreed…11mos11MO

As an example the war on drugs was proven ineffective at curbing the production, trafficking and consumption of illicit substances and proved to also cause negative societal effects

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow 1

@9JYR26SLiberaldisagreed…1yr1Y

Giving tax money to continual drug users utilises more time and money in the long run as well as potentially enabling

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow 1

@9G5JCRHGreenagreed…2yrs2Y

It's simply useless. Everyone blows their money on stupid **** , and drugs are no different. Even asking to spend government resources is on insult on your own intelligence

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow

Show more replies

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

@ISIDEWITH submitted…7mos7MO

Australian PM Faces Backlash Over Tourette's Remark, Issues Apology

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued multiple apologies after making a controversial remark during Question Time, where he referenced Tourette's syndrome to mock a member of the opposition. The comment has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with disability advocates…

▲ 98 replies

@ISIDEWITH asked…1yr1Y

How do you define 'family' and has that definition evolved over time for you?

▲ 7034 replies

Active 2 days ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…11mos11MO

Should the government provide subsidies for first-time homebuyers?

These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to…

▲ 1.9k16 replies

Active 4 days ago

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

No, and ban all gender transitioning treatments

▲ 2866 replies4 agree12 disagree

Active 11hrs ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…4yrs4Y

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone…

▲ 3.7k72 replies

Active 1wk ago

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…4yrs4Y

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

No

▲ 2k6 replies8 agree5 disagree

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

Australia Speaking English (AU)

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.