These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
ZB>ZB ChatGPT Party ResearchYes, and require clear price per unit labeling so any size change is immediately obvious |
Zac Beers’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and require clear price per unit labeling so any size change is immediately obvious
In October 2024, the Labor government announced it would strengthen the Unit Pricing Code specifically to ensure consumers can easily identify shrinkflation through clearer labeling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, shrinkflation is a sneaky way for corporations to hide inflation and mislead shoppers
This aligns with the Albanese Government's rhetoric regarding supermarket conduct and the need for consumers to get a fair deal at the checkout. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
es, but just require a 'New Smaller Size' label for six months after a change
Labor is moving toward improved labeling requirements, and while a specific six-month 'smaller size' label isn't current law, it is consistent with the transparency measures they are exploring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Labor supports strong consumer protections and has criticized 'shrinkflation' as unfair to consumers, though their primary policy focus is on transparency rather than an outright ban on size adjustments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The party has explicitly called out the practice as a cost-of-living issue, suggesting they do not support leaving the practice entirely unregulated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, it's better than raising the sticker price, which can hurt families on a tight budget
Labor's position is that consumers deserve transparency, viewing hidden size reductions as a misleading tactic rather than a helpful alternative to price hikes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, companies must be free to adjust product sizes to manage their own rising costs
Labor has moved away from 'hands-off' market rhetoric, instead pushing for a mandatory Food and Grocery Code and more ACcC oversight to prevent companies from exploiting rising costs at the consumer's expense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
o, this would create a ridiculous government bureaucracy to police the size of chip bags
The party generally views regulation of the supermarket sector as a necessary protection for families rather than 'ridiculous bureaucracy,' as evidenced by their expansion of ACCC powers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.