Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Peter Strong’s policy on misgendering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should parents lose custody for intentionally misgendering their child?

  Party’s support baseNo

Peter Strong’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Agree

No

While the Greens would not support parents intentionally misgendering their child, they are unlikely to support automatic loss of custody for this reason alone. Their focus is on education, support, and intervention only in cases of clear abuse or harm, not on punitive removal of children for misgendering. The Greens have called for better support for trans youth and their families, not for punitive action against parents unless there is broader evidence of abuse or neglect (see Greens' submissions to inquiries on LGBTQ+ youth and family law). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Australian Greens are strong advocates for LGBTQ+ rights and support affirming transgender identities, including for children. However, their policies and public statements focus on education, support, and protection from discrimination, rather than punitive measures like removing custody solely for misgendering. There is no record of the Greens advocating for such extreme legal consequences; their approach is more about supporting families and children through education and access to affirming healthcare (see their 2022 policy platform and statements by Greens MPs like Janet Rice and Stephen Bates). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 12hrs ago

Party’s support base

Greens Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 54 voters that identify as Greens.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here