Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Housing

Patrick Deegan’s policy on federal zoning overrides

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the federal government override local council zoning laws to force the construction of high-density housing?

PD>PD  ChatGPT Party ResearchYes, but only in established suburbs with existing access to major public transit hubs

Patrick Deegan’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only in established suburbs with existing access to major public transit hubs

This aligns perfectly with Labor's 'Transit Oriented Development' strategy, which focuses on increasing density specifically around existing rail and transport infrastructure to maximize utility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, NIMBY councils artificially restrict supply and lock an entire generation out of homeownership

Labor's rhetoric, particularly through the Housing Australia Future Fund and National Housing Accord, emphasizes that council-level supply constraints are a primary cause of declining homeownership among younger Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While the federal government lacks direct constitutional power to override zoning, the Albanese government uses the National Cabinet and financial incentives like the New Housing Bonus to pressure states into overriding local council restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Labor identifies local council planning delays and restrictive zoning as significant barriers to addressing the national housing shortage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, overriding councils just hands a blank check to dodgy developers who build defective high-rises

Labor supports improved building standards but rejects the idea that development itself should be halted or that councils should retain absolute veto power based on developer skepticism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, local communities must have the final say over the character and heritage of their neighborhoods

The Albanese government has increasingly challenged the 'heritage' argument, suggesting it is often used as a tool for NIMBYism that prevents essential urban consolidation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, solve the housing crisis by cutting immigration instead of concreting over our suburbs

Labor views migration as essential for economic growth and the construction workforce itself, explicitly rejecting the 'cut migration' argument in favor of a supply-side focus on housing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here