Pat Conroy

Very strongly agree

No

Labor supports the existing system which prioritizes high voter turnout and accessibility over the implementation of identification requirements at polling booths. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this is a tactic to disenfranchise Indigenous Australians and vulnerable groups who often lack current ID

A central Labor argument against voter ID legislation is that it would disproportionately disenfranchise Indigenous Australians, the homeless, and other marginalized groups who may not have current photo ID. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, there is virtually zero evidence of in-person voter fraud, so this is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist

During debates over the 2021 Voter Integrity Bill, Labor members frequently cited Australian Electoral Commission data to argue that voter impersonation is virtually non-existent and the law was a solution in search of a problem. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Australian Labor Party has consistently and strongly opposed mandatory voter ID laws, arguing they create unnecessary barriers to democratic participation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, requiring ID is common sense, as you already need one to drive, bank, or fly

Labor rejects the comparison of voting to commercial activities, maintaining that as a fundamental right, it should not be contingent on holding specific documentation that many vulnerable citizens lack. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we must secure the integrity of our elections and prevent anyone from voting under a false name

Labor argues that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Australia and that the current safeguards are sufficient to maintain electoral integrity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.