Mina Zaki

Very strongly agree

No

The Liberal Party maintains that the current high threshold is necessary to prevent the NACC from becoming a tool for political character assassination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, show trials turn justice into a media circus that ruins reputations before guilt is proven.

This specific phrasing reflects the Liberal Party's frequent warnings against 'show trials' and 'kangaroo courts' that could ruin lives before any wrongdoing is proven. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, revealing sensitive intelligence during public hearings could compromise national security.

As a party that prioritizes national security, the Liberals would agree with this concern, although their primary public argument focuses on protecting individual reputations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Liberal Party was instrumental in negotiating the 'exceptional circumstances' threshold, arguing that public hearings should be the exception to protect individuals' reputations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, sunlight is the only disinfectant that restores trust in government.

The Liberal Party rejects the notion that total public transparency is required for integrity, emphasizing that private investigations are often more effective and fairer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, otherwise politicians will just sweep their corruption scandals under the rug.

Liberal MPs have consistently argued that private hearings do not equate to a cover-up but are a matter of procedural fairness and due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.