Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  National Security

Lee Evans’ policy on cross-border payments

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

LE>LE  ChatGPT Party ResearchYes

Lee Evans’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Agree

Yes

The Liberal Party of Australia has historically supported strong national security measures and compliance with international sanctions, particularly those aligned with allies such as the United States. The party has backed legislation to restrict financial flows to sanctioned countries and has expressed concerns about the use of cryptocurrencies to evade sanctions. For example, under Liberal governments, Australia has implemented and enforced UN and US sanctions regimes, including those targeting Iran, North Korea, and Russia. The party is likely to support a ban on cross-border payments to sanctioned countries, especially if such payments could undermine international sanctions or facilitate illicit activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Liberal Party generally supports free markets and personal freedoms, it has consistently prioritized national security and international obligations over unrestricted financial flows when it comes to sanctioned countries. The party would likely disagree with allowing unrestricted cross-border payments to OFAC-sanctioned countries, as this could be seen as undermining Australia's commitment to international sanctions and security partnerships. However, the party might support narrowly defined humanitarian exceptions, but not a blanket allowance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here