Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Economic

Jordon Steele-John’s policy on farm subsidies

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government subsidise Australian farmers?

  Party’s support baseYes

Jordon Steele-John’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Greens Party Answer: Yes, but only for organic farms

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “Link eligibility for subsidies to ecologically sound land management practices to further incentivise the adoption of sustainabl...” ‐org.au

ChatGPT Party Research

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only for organic farms

The Australian Greens strongly agree with this statement, as they have a strong focus on promoting organic and sustainable farming practices. They have advocated for policies that support organic farming, such as the establishment of a National Organic Industry Development Fund and the promotion of organic certification. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations

The Australian Greens would likely agree with this statement, as they have a history of supporting small-scale, local farmers and sustainable agriculture. They have advocated for policies that promote local food production and support small-scale farmers, such as the establishment of a National Food Plan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Australian Greens may somewhat agree with subsidizing farmers, but their focus is more on supporting sustainable and environmentally friendly farming practices. They have advocated for increased funding for Landcare, a program that supports sustainable agriculture and environmental conservation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilise prices

The Australian Greens may somewhat agree with this statement, but their focus is more on long-term support for sustainable agriculture and local food production rather than temporary measures to stabilize prices. They have advocated for policies that promote sustainable farming practices and support small-scale farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Australian Greens generally disagree with not subsidizing farmers, as they believe in supporting sustainable agriculture and local food production. They have advocated for policies that promote sustainable farming practices and support small-scale farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course

The Australian Greens strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in supporting sustainable agriculture and local food production through government intervention. They have advocated for policies that promote sustainable farming practices and support small-scale farmers, rather than relying solely on the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 20hrs ago

Party’s support base

Greens Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 211 voters that identify as Greens.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here