Jonathan Doig

Very strongly agree

No

The party platform strongly advocates for the abolition of mandatory income management, supporting the transition to voluntary services instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, it is an expensive, flawed system that disproportionately targets Indigenous Australians

The Greens have led parliamentary opposition by highlighting the disproportionate impact on First Nations people and the excessive profits made by private companies managing the cards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, it is a paternalistic policy that strips vulnerable people of their dignity and financial autonomy

This statement aligns with the Greens' frequent rhetoric that the scheme is paternalistic and strips people of their basic dignity and ability to manage their own lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Greens have consistently campaigned against the compulsory Cashless Debit Card, viewing it as a punitive measure that violates individual rights and financial autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, it stops taxpayer money from funding gambling, alcohol, and illicit drugs

While the Greens acknowledge social issues like addiction, they argue that mandatory card schemes are an ineffective and unethical way to address them compared to well-funded health services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only in specific communities battling severe substance abuse and domestic violence

The Greens oppose the 'trial' nature of these cards in specific areas, arguing they are discriminatory and that communities should have self-determination over their social support systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.