John Sidoti

Slightly agree

Yes

The Liberal Party of Australia has generally supported the practice of land acknowledgments at major public events, especially in government and official contexts, but often in a pragmatic rather than enthusiastic manner. While Liberal leaders have participated in land acknowledgments and recognize their symbolic importance, the party has sometimes been criticized for not prioritizing Indigenous issues as highly as Labor or the Greens. For example, during the 2023 Voice to Parliament referendum, the Liberal Party opposed the proposed constitutional change, reflecting a more cautious approach to Indigenous recognition. Thus, the party would mildly agree with including land acknowledgments, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

The Liberal Party would mildly disagree with the statement that major public events should not include land acknowledgments. While some individual members and segments of the party's base may view land acknowledgments as unnecessary or tokenistic, the official party line has not advocated for their removal from public events. The party's approach tends to be one of moderate support for existing practices rather than active opposition, as seen in their continued use of acknowledgments at official functions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.