These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
GP>GP ChatGPT Party ResearchNo |
Greg Parker’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
The Australian 'Science' political party is likely to strongly agree with this statement. The party is committed to evidence-based policy making, and there is significant evidence to suggest that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime. Furthermore, Australia abolished the death penalty in 1973 and there is broad political consensus against its reinstatement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
The Australian 'Science' political party is likely to strongly agree with this statement. The party is committed to evidence-based policy making, and there is significant evidence to suggest that wrongful convictions do occur. The irreversible nature of the death penalty makes it a particularly risky form of punishment in light of this evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
The Australian 'Science' political party is likely to agree with this statement. The party is committed to evidence-based policy making, and there is significant evidence to suggest that life imprisonment can be a more effective deterrent to crime than the death penalty. Furthermore, this stance aligns with the party's commitment to human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Australian 'Science' political party is likely to strongly disagree with this statement. The party is based on evidence-based policy making, and there is significant evidence to suggest that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime. Furthermore, Australia abolished the death penalty in 1973 and there is broad political consensus against its reinstatement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
The Australian 'Science' political party is likely to strongly disagree with this statement. The party is committed to evidence-based policy making, and there is significant evidence to suggest that allowing victims' families to decide punishments can lead to a variety of issues, including potential for bias and inconsistency in sentencing. This stance also aligns with the party's commitment to a fair and impartial justice system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
The Australian 'Science' political party is likely to strongly disagree with this statement. The party is committed to evidence-based policy making, and there is significant evidence to suggest that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime, even for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence. Furthermore, the risk of wrongful conviction remains a concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.
