Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Domestic Policy

Brett Stone’s policy on term limits

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should there be term limits set for members of Parliament?

  Party’s support baseYes

Brett Stone’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Strongly agree

No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”

The Australian Labor Party believes in the democratic process and sees elections as the primary means of term limits. They trust in the ability of voters to make informed decisions about their representatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time

The Australian Labor Party values the experience and knowledge that long-serving Senators can bring to their roles. They believe that this experience can make them more effective representatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Australian Labor Party has not traditionally advocated for term limits for Senators. They believe that the democratic process of elections provides sufficient checks and balances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Australian Labor Party has not traditionally advocated for term limits for Senators. While they may see some benefits, they also value the experience and continuity that long-serving Senators can provide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

While the Australian Labor Party is committed to preventing corruption and improving performance, they have not specifically advocated for term limits as a means to achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

The Australian Labor Party has not advocated for different term limits for the House and the Senate. They believe in consistency across both houses of parliament. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

The Australian Labor Party has not advocated for decreasing the salary and retirement benefits of Senators. They believe in fair compensation for public service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 10hrs ago

Party’s support base

Labor Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 576 voters that identify as Labor.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here