Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Andrew Zbik’s policy on misgendering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should parents lose custody for intentionally misgendering their child?

  Party’s support baseNo

Andrew Zbik’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Agree

No

While the ALP would not strongly endorse parents intentionally misgendering their child, they would generally oppose the idea that this alone should result in loss of custody. Their policies focus on supporting families and children through education and mental health services, not punitive removal. The party's support for anti-discrimination laws and inclusive education (e.g., Safe Schools) shows a preference for positive engagement rather than harsh penalties. However, if misgendering were part of broader abuse or neglect, intervention could be considered, but not for misgendering alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Australian Labor Party (ALP) supports LGBTQ+ rights and has advocated for protections for transgender individuals, including children. However, the party has not supported policies as extreme as removing custody solely for intentionally misgendering a child. Their approach tends to focus on education, support, and anti-discrimination measures rather than punitive actions against parents. For example, in debates around the Safe Schools program and conversion therapy bans, Labor has emphasized support and inclusion rather than punitive family interventions. There is no historical precedent of the ALP advocating for custody loss on these grounds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 9hrs ago

Party’s support base

Labor Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 83 voters that identify as Labor.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here